From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. Amit Gotswami Puppymonkeybaby proves Rubio talking point Obama is destroying Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. Is this a hoax to promote positivity? The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). Philosophy Meaning of Arntz' Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" - 850 16 Quotes From the Movies ideas - Pinterest He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. The flip side of that is that you can use quantum mechanics, again in specially prepared systems, to communicate in a way that will allow us to know when someone is eavesdropping. Is the movie What The Bleep Do We Know? factual or mumbo jumbo - Quora The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. 7. If you have questions about your account, please What the Bleep Do We Know? | Not Even Wrong - Columbia University The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. Your subscription to " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 (stylized as What t #$*! In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. 1. 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' : An insult to science and spirituality [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? unless you renew or Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". What the Bleep Do We Know!? They want suggestions, not formulas. 1. The observer can't be ignored." Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. What the 'Bleep'!?:Down The Rabbit Hole - DVD Talk A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". This will be revisited if any. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Do We Know!?) John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. The film was also discussed in a letter published in Physics Today that challenges how physics is taught, saying teaching fails to "expose the mysteries physics has encountered [and] reveal the limits of our understanding". Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. Science Monitor has expired. You can't just hope for the best. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. It was really hard to sit through. Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. What The Bleep Do We Know - 4minutes TRAILER - YouTube Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." And wait-the human body is mostly water! 2. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. This message will appear once per week Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless Possibilities for The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. mixed truisms with conjecture, interviews and dramatic "recreations" of the ideas being discussed, to form a kind of cohesive supposition on the link between mind and matter, biology and the Big Bang. Answer (1 of 6): Although not being as well educated in the area as Professor Wacker, I think it's overly simplistic to suggest the subjects raised in the movie to be either factual or "almost completely mumbo-jumbo". One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. If COVID-19 mRNA is safe where are the libel lawsuits by Pharma? document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. What The Bleep Do We Know? Review | Movie - Empire Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. Even so it notched up $10m in. Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." Joe Dispenza If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? [2]. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. It was one of the most important moments in history. Questions about What the Bleep Do We Know? : askscience subscription. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. They don't go anywhere, Fred. What The Bleep Do We Know? - Home - Facebook Free delivery for many products. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" IE 11 is not supported. People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. . You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. and published a study guide. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. PDF Hidden Messages In Water But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! It is just a movie. Q. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. . Dr Candice Pert There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science.